The Vexxed question of Vaxelis
Genetically modified or not, the fact is that this childhood vaccine has a dreadful safety profile and like all vaccines, is best at preventing good health, not infection.
A few days ago, I published a substack about a fairly new 6-in-1 shot that was starting to be used in Australia called Vaxelis. Manufactured by Merck, a company with a shameful history of covering up the harm caused by their drugs (e.g. Vioxx and the MMR vaccine), Vaxelis is touted as being safe and effective - that old canard - whilst the available evidence demonstrates nothing could be further from the truth.
Now, there is a lot of doubt as to whether this shot does contain rDNA (not mRNA as a lot of people seemed to think I was saying), so I have written to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) - the regulator who licensed this and all other drugs and vaccines - to ask for clarification. A brief reminder to you all that the TGA obtains about 96-98% of the money needed for their operating expenses from licensing fees levied on the companies whose products they are supposed to regulate - not from the Australian Government.
See my note below:
I am writing for clarification regarding information published about the Vaxelis vaccine on this page of your website - https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/auspmd/vaxelis
Under the section: What post-market commitments will the sponsor undertake
The Hepatitis B portion of this vaccine is described as rDNA.
My question is - would this Hepatitis B portion be exactly the same as the Hepatitis B portion of the Engerix-B vaccines? If it differs, how is it different?
The use of the abbreviation rDNA might lead one to assume that this is a genetically-modified portion of this vaccine. If it is GMO, then that is important to know and might justify its inclusion in the Black Triangle Scheme and the particular noting of this requirement on the web page above. But this is not clear.
One other question: The prescribing information states: VAXELIS has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility. Will this evaluation be performed in the future? If so, when will that be?
Of course, no vaccine has ever been evaluated for carcinogenic (cancer-causing), mutagenic (ability to cause genetic mutations) effects, or their ability to impair fertility. But I felt it might be a good thing to ask the TGA about this aspect to see what their response would be.
So far - crickets.
I wrote on Monday, October 23rd. If I don’t hear anything by the close of business on Monday, October 30th, I will follow up and keep following up until I get an answer. I will of course, let you all know what I find out.
But in the meantime, just so you know how ‘seriously’ the TGA and the Australian Government take their responsibility to serve the people of this nation, here is what has been shared with me about Vaxelis. Thank you to Sharon and everyone else who provided me with information.
Below is the assessment report used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2015 when considering this vaccine. On page 124, you will see that seven infants died during the pre-licensure trial. Not to worry, however, “None of the deaths were considered to be related to the study vaccinations. “
Ema Assessment Report Dated 176.32MB ∙ PDF fileDownloadDownload
Every death following a Positive PCR test was caused by the underlying virus or bacteria, whilst every death following a vaccine (or every adverse reaction) - no matter how closely related in time - is obviously “not related to the … vaccinations.”
I’m glad we could clear that up.
Also, in that assessment report, if you turn to pages 128-130, you will see that there is a list of potential concerns with this vaccine, including apnoea, seizures/convulsions, encephalitis/encephalopathy, anaphylaxis and a lack of information on how children under six weeks of age, those born prematurely or those who are immunocompromised will react to this jab. Despite this dearth of data, the shot is being injected into millions of infants and children, and reactions and deaths are discounted or ignored completely.
Again, thanks to Sharon, I have the report from Australia’s DAEN (The Database of Adverse Event Notifications) on Vaxelis.
Daen List Of 22 Reports 23 Oct 2023 Up To 610.4KB ∙ XLSX fileDownloadDownload
Between August 8 and October 6, 2023, there were 22 reaction reports registered on the DAEN. Keep in mind that it is estimated only 1% to 10% of drug and vaccine reactions ever get reported, and you will see the potential size of this problem.
An old problem is getting worse with every new vaccine
Many people think that vaccine deaths and reactions start and end with the experimental COVID gene-modification injection. Nothing could be further from the truth!
The fact is that babies, children and adults (as well as companion and farm animals) have been killed and permanently injured by ALL vaccines for hundreds of years. It is because we ignored what was happening to our babies that we are currently in this situation where our rights to object to or discuss vaccine harms have been taken away.
There is no such thing as a safe vaccine.
There is no such thing as a safe drug.
Every medical product carries with it a risk of serious side effects, including death. It is up to every one of us to decide if that risk is worthwhile after - and only after - we have had a chance to become informed about all of the potential risks vs benefits and are allowed to make our own decision without fear of discrimination, coercion, financial penalties or other detriment.
We have stayed silent for too long. We have allowed the criminals in pHarma, the government, the medical community and the media to dictate what we will and will not do with our own bodies and the bodies of our minor children. It is time for us to say a resounding NO to anyone who thinks they have that right or power over us.
