CNN Trolls us with the dumbest excuse ever for the ineffectiveness of COVID jabs!

If you get a bad night's sleep, the jab won't work...

CNN Trolls us with the dumbest excuse ever for the ineffectiveness of COVID jabs!

Vaccines aren’t ineffective because they are based on junk science that was proved to be wrong over 80 years ago. Oh no! They are ineffective because you didn’t get enough sleep the night before you received them. So it’s all on you, naughty thing!

grayscale photo of sleeping woman lying on bed
Photo by Kinga Howard on Unsplash

In the article, entitled Sleep affects your immunity after vaccination. Here’s how, Sandee LaMotte claims that not getting a good night’s sleep the night before receiving an experimental, gene-modification injection could prevent the jab from working.

Whilst Sandee tries to appear all sciencey and knowledgable about this new paper entitled A meta-analysis of the associations between insufficient sleep duration and antibody response to vaccination, it is obvious that she or he never actually read the paper or didn’t understand it. And once again, there was no inquiry as to whether this paper actually showed ANYTHING about the efficacy of COVID jabs - with or without a good night’s sleep.

Informed Choice is a reader-supported publication. This is a subscriber-only post. To read the rest of this article and to receive future posts like this, please consider supporting me with a subscription. You can subscribe at the special 36% off rate until Friday, March 17th!


This article is a meta-analysis (meaning it doesn’t actually provide any new research - it is simply looking at previously-published articles).

It pulled 165 articles from the literature but not one of the articles actually concerned antibodies following the administration of a COVID jab.

The abstract reads:

Vaccination is a major strategy to control a viral pandemic. Simple behavioral interventions that might boost vaccine responses have yet to be identified. We conducted meta-analyses to summarize the evidence linking the amount of sleep obtained in the days surrounding vaccination to antibody response in healthy adults. Authors of the included studies provided the information needed to accurately estimate the pooled effect size (ES) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and to examine sex differences.1-7 The association between selfreported short sleep (<6 h/night) and reduced vaccine response did not reach our pre-defined statistical significant criteria (total n = 504, ages 18–85; overall ES [95% CI] = 0.29 [0.04, 0.63]). Objectively assessed short sleep was associated with a robust decrease in antibody response (total n = 304, ages 18–60; overall ES [95% CI] = 0.79 [0.40, 1.18]). In men, the pooled ES was large (overall ES [95% CI] = 0.93 [0.54, 1.33]), whereas it did not reach significance in women (overall ES [95% CI] = 0.42 [0.49, 1.32]). These results provide evidence that insufficient sleep duration substantially decreases the response to anti-viral vaccination and suggests that achieving adequate amount of sleep during the days surrounding vaccination may enhance and prolong the humoral response. Large-scale well-controlled studies are urgently needed to define (1) the window of time around inoculation when optimizing sleep duration is most beneficial, (2) the causes of the sex disparity in the impact of sleep on the response, and (3) the amount of sleep needed to protect the response.

Call me crazy, but to my mind, this is just another attempt to deflect attention from the fact that vaccines simply don’t work. Never have. Never will.

Knowledge of the ineffectiveness of vaccine-induced antibodies is over 80 years old

And using antibody responses as a metric for trying to determine vaccine effectiveness is just false. We have known from published science since the 1940s that antibodies ≠ immunity. Look up Dr Merrill Chase who first proved that if antibodies play a role at all in protection against disease, it is only a tangential one. Antibodies indicate EXPOSURE, not IMMUNITY.

This is a fact that has been twisted and macerated until it is barely recognisable by the ‘vaccines are better than natural immunity’ brigade in relation to COVID-19. We have gone from being told that antibodies are protective to hearing - they are only protective against COVID if they have been generated by the jab - not by previous infection. See Coronavirus: Antibodies don’t indicate immunity, as just one example of this claptrap!

So in every other infection - including respiratory viral infections - evidence of antibodies - regardless of the source has always equalled protection from future infection. After all, that’s why we have used vaccines for all this time - to induce the production of serum antibodies in order to provide immunity from infection. Never mind all the evidence that the serologically ‘immune’ still get infected…inconvenient facts can be ignored. Science 101.

It is literally painful to read this article. The attempt to link studies between sleep and antibody production (again, not a measure of immunity) with advice for people to make sure they get a good night’s sleep the night before taking a shot that we already know won’t provide protection against infection or transmission is shocking!

Yet, one of the co-authors of this ‘study’, Dr Michael Irwin, isn’t prevented from providing the following pseudo-scientific advice to doctors who are administering these kill shots:

“If I was working with patients to give them a vaccination, I would inquire whether they’re having problems with sleep and whether they were sleep deprived the night before,” Irwin said. “If they are, I would ask them to come back when they are fully rested.”

Perhaps that advice should be changed to:

If I was working with patients, I would inquire whether they had actually read any information about the ineffectiveness, harms and deaths following administration of COVID or other jabs? If they hadn’t, I would ask them to do some reading and come back when they were fully informed. Of course, 99% of them would never return, meaning they had actually followed the doctor’s orders.

What do you think? What would be best advice be for patients? What Dr Irwin suggested or my recommendation?

Don’t forget that as a paid subscriber to Informed Choice, you can chat about this or any other issues in my new Discord Server. Click this link to join in but please don’t share this with others. Instead, Share the post using the Share link below.